Developments
in CAD and GIS Integration Bring Design and Mapping
Professionals the Best of Both Worlds
By David McGee
Take a quick survey among
CAD and GIS vendors, and you'll find them hard at work
creating products that make the two technologies more
complementary. As both CAD and GIS have evolved, it's
become necessary for mapping and design professionals to
tap the strengths of both to manage increasingly complex
challenges. At the heart of GIS and CAD integration lies
this issue: Can professionals feasibly and
cost-effectively access the data they need to resolve
design problems and make sound business decisions based on
GIS maps?
Looking at the variety of
software solutions that have emerged to achieve
integration, the answer is a resounding Yes! Autodesk, the
Sausalito, Calif.-based publisher of AutoCAD, has
developed the AutoCAD Data Extension that runs as an
AutoCAD ADS application and introduces many automated
mapping functions that work directly in AutoCAD and with
the .DWG file format. For addressing civil engineering's
3D digital-terrain modeling and high demands for CAD
accuracy, Plus III Software, Atlanta, offers Terramodel, a
3D land-design tool that links to ARC/INFO GIS data.
Also targeting the
civil-engineering niche, Genasys, Fort Collins, Colo., has
developed GenaCivil that runs with the company's GenaMap
GIS or as a stand alone application. GenaCivil is an
enhanced CAD interface for civil engineering and features
TIN (Triangulated Irregular Network) terrain modeling
that's preferred when high accuracy is required for
working with small land areas. In an effort to treat CAD
and GIS as one element, Intergraph, Huntsville, Ala., has
incorporated its PC-based CAD product Microstation with
its GIS software MGE Modeler and Framme, a software engine
for distributed information systems in the utility
industry. An update of its MGE PC, MGE PC2 is slated for a
January 1995 release. Moreover, Intergraph has increased
its software's openness by publishing the Microstation
file format. This move ups the ante for which vendor can
claim the highest level of open systems; most other
vendors' formats remain proprietary, though some kind of
programming interface or integration tool kit is typically
provided.
The Urge to Merge
A vendor's background influences heavily the approach it
pursues to achieve integration. Whether a CAD vendor is
introducing GIS features into the CAD environment, or the
opposite, a GIS vendor offering CAD features within GIS,
the resulting hybrid software environments have come a
long way in overcoming each technology's shortcomings.
CAD's strengths have remained its double-precision
accuracy and the ability to express complex curves and 3D
geometry that until recently GIS systems could not. Yet,
GIS has never been concerned with that high a level of
accuracy and geometric constructs, and has instead focused
on providing a topological data model that's unavailable
in CAD.
On the other hand, CAD
systems quickly reach their performance limit when
attempting to manipulate large map databases (some CAD
systems, running without performance-enhancing
applications, require as long as a half hour to load large
files). CAD systems haven't matched the great variety of
projections so prevalent in GIS, and users have had to
settle for a sheet view of drawings and being able only to
render profile or cross-section views. CAD system
translators accomplished graphics translation to GIS, but
what of accessing non-graphic attribute data (left behind
by translators) that's critical to GIS analysis? These are
some of the major differences between the two technologies
that GIS and CAD vendors have sought to assuage. Let's now
look at how CAD vendors have introduced GIS functions into
their software.
AutoCAD Data Extension Enhances Automated Mapping
Any GIS professional crossing into the CAD arena will
likely have to work with AutoCAD .DWG data since a lot of
data are stored in this format. Since ADE works within
AutoCAD, it allows users to bypass the translation
bottlenecks when CAD data is converted for use in
automated mapping. And, when GIS files grow in complexity,
ADE permits more efficient management and access of large
GIS files. Current AutoCAD users can immediately begin GIS
work with a minimum investment, for ADE integrates with
AutoCAD Release 12 with no additional system requirements.
Choosing data locations
from query dialog boxes and highlighting drawing sections
with a window, points, or polylines are all
straightforward functions in ADE. And users can further
define location criteria by combining them with AutoCAD
properties such as a layer, attribute, elevation, line
type, block name, or area, among others. Productivity
enhancements result when users can readily access only
portions of drawings they need, and this selected data can
be modified, analyzed and saved back to the drawing.
Users will find in ADE
these kinds of automated-mapping features in abundance,
for the product is deliberately designed for GIS and CAD
customers desiring simplified automated mapping rather
than high-end GIS analytical tools. Users looking to
manage assets and infrastructure with .DWG-formatted data
will find ADE the ideal match. For more sophisticated
analysis, users can transfer into ArcCAD, a GIS product
from Environmental Systems Research Institute that links
with AutoCAD.
Another ADE feature
addresses the problem of changing X-Y coordinate
projections to map projections by providing more than 300
cartographic coordinate systems and a facility for
converting projections. Presently ADE for AutoCAD Release
13 is under development and will take advantage of Release
13's object-oriented design, which could, in the long-run,
permit ADE to create even tighter links between attribute
data and entities. Also on the horizon is incorporating a
topological data model into ADE. This would standardize
the numerous topological data models that exist among
AutoCAD GIS applications and bring AutoCAD and ADE even
further into the GIS world.
Treating GIS and CAD as One Element
Intergraph, on another part of the CAD spectrum, was once
a name synonymous with proprietary, turnkey systems. A
sea-change in strategy two years ago at Intergraph
resulted in the porting of its CAD and GIS software to
Windows, NT, DOS and Intergraph's version of UNIX. That
Microstation's file format is publicly available
complements Intergraph's CAD and GIS integration, which is
also bolstered by MGE Modeler, MGE PC and Framme
incorporating Microstation. Now Intergraph's GIS users can
benefit from CAD's high accuracy and directly access
Microstation's CAD objects and geometry to achieve a more
precise description of GIS data.
Another Microstation
advantage: it imports and exports AutoCAD .DWG data,
enhancing Intergraph's GIS systems ability to accommodate
data from many sources. Included with Intergraph's efforts
to improve data integration are built-in tools for raster
and vector integration, and it's Intergraph's view that
GIS should accommodate both data types. Having this
capability boosts performance for displaying in map form a
mass amount of data quickly. Users looking to expand their
GIS work on the desktop will find in MGE PC features for
building SQL queries via using a simple interface.
Like Autodesk, Intergraph
provides links that associate attribute data stored in an
external database to entities appearing in a CAD or GIS
system, and Intergraph also has developed object-oriented
techniques in its software. Object-oriented features
permit a more powerful association of data elements; for
example, if a user moves a line entity, other elements
relevant to the line can move with it. Having examined CAD
and GIS integration from a CAD perspective, a review of
GIS vendors' integration efforts is in order.
GIS and CAD in Civil Engineering:
Bringing GIS into the 3D Realm
It's Plus III Software's view that for land-design
applications, the CAD data model falls short because CAD
models primarily use information needed to render a design
for drafting, not information required to create the
design. Moreover, the CAD data model doesn't support types
of data that civil engineers use in designing, editing and
analysis. This hinders extensions of CAD programs into
area of 3D digital-terrain modeling (DTM) and ambitions to
connect a DTM to GIS topology and attribute data.
But applying a parametric
3-D surface modeler such as Plus III's Terramodel
eliminates these barriers, enabling civil engineers to
design and associate design elements in plan, profile and
sheet views. Terramodel also supports a suite of
civil-design applications: coordinate geometry, legal
descriptions, contouring, profiles, cross sections, 3-D
views, site design, hydrology and roadway design. Data
capture in the form of photogrammery, GPS and data
collectors is another feature.
Another Plus III product,
Terragration, links Terramodel's design tools with
ARC/INFO data. Unlike vector-based CAD Systems, Terramodel
is point-based, so data is accessible in much richer
detail; according to Plus III, Terramodel provides civil
engineers the ability to work with large data sets in
excess of 1 million points. With Terramodel and ARC/INFO
running concurrently, civil engineers who don't find the
3D functionality in some GIS systems adequate can process
ARC/INFO data in a DTM model and apply tools such as
coordinate geometry, site design, roadway design, sewer
and storm water design, hydrology, surface modeling, and
volumetric analysis.
The result of Plus III's
style of integration is sharing and linking attribute
data, topology and 3D surface data all in the same
software environment. Through its 3D ToolPak that enables
third-party integration, Terramodel will soon work with
other ESRI products, ArcCAD and ArcView. Terramodel
operates on DOS and UNIX platforms, and a Windows release
is scheduled for April 1995. Plus III also has more
integration products on the horizon, including a link to
ERDAS's Orthomax software that will allow stereo
photography to be overlaid in Terramodel.
Also in the area of civil
engineering, Genasys's CAD/civil engineering interface
with GIS called GenaCivil can automate data retrieval
information relevant to a design, especially when
engineers must accommodate a design to a surrounding
environment. Traditionally, this process of gathering data
from a design's environment remained separate from design
work and has had to be done manually. Through GenaCivil's
attributes database handling and links to relational
databases, design-environment information can be collected
more efficiently.
An example would be the
Federal Emergency Management Agency's digital conversion
of its flood insurance rate maps. GenaCivil has proved
instrumental in helping the agency generate new flood
plain maps with greater speed and accuracy. GenaCivil's
interface can search for data required for building the
digital maps: bridge locations, stream channels and other
data related to terrain.
It's clear developments in
GIS and CAD are working toward much greater efficiency for
users who can benefit from combining both technologies.
This will definitely ensure a wealth of solutions for
professionals to choose from, and CAD and GIS users
needn't feel encumbered by the lack of projection
conversion or inadequate translations. Today's software
solutions have resolved these stumbling blocks of the
past. Vendors' introduction of object-oriented features
have promise to introduce greater intelligence into CAD
and GIS and enrich their capabilities to create thematic
maps. From all indications, those looking to harness the
productivity enhancements of CAD and GIS integration have
a lot to look forward to.
About the Author:
David McGee is a freelance writer in San
Francisco specializing in CAD and GIS applications. He can
be reached at 415-826-1491.
Back
|