EOM
Airborne: Evaluation of a Digital Camera System for
Natural Resource Management
By
Tom Bobbe and Jim McKean
Introduction
Resource managers
are continually looking for more efficient methods to
acquire accurate and up-to-date information describing the
land under their jurisdiction. The U.S.D.A. Forest Service
is currently using remote sensing systems, including
satellites, airborne multispectral scanners, thermal
imagers, airborne video and aerial photography, to support
a variety of information needs, such as updating GIS
databases, delineating forest ecosystems, and monitoring
forest health trends.
A new development in
electronic imaging technology has provided another system
to acquire remote sensing data. Recently introduced
professional quality color digital camera systems have
features especially useful for conducting natural resource
aerial surveys. Digital camera systems can provide a high
resolution digital image that can be easily integrated
into an image processing and GIS environment. Since film
does not have to be processed or scanned, digital cameras
are well suited for small projects which require imagery
within a short time frame.
During August 1994, a Kodak
DSC 420 digital camera system was used, in combination
with airborne video and a 70 mm film camera, as a remote
sensing tool to support a riparian mapping and monitoring
project. The objectives of this project were to acquire
remote sensing imagery to document the current condition
of riparian vegetation and to map the location of stream
channels in the Golden Trout Wilderness Area of the Inyo
National Forest. The project also provided an opportunity
to examine and compare features of the digital camera,
airborne video, and small format aerial photography.
The Digital Camera System
Instead of film, digital cameras use a charge coupled
device (CCD) to capture color images. The Kodak DCS 420
utilizes a high resolution CCD which consists of an array
of photosites (pixels) to convert photons into electrons
and produce a signal whose magnitude can be digitized,
processed and stored electronically. The physical shape
and size of the digital camera is similar to a
conventional 35 mm film camera. In fact, the Kodak DCS 420
uses a Nikon N90 camera body without the standard film
back. A modified camera back mounts a 1,524 by 1,012 pixel
resolution CCD where film would normally be located. The
remainder of the digital camera back contains the
microprocessor, image memory, hard drive and batteries.
Images are stored on removable PCMCIA hard drives which
are commercially available in different capacities.
Since the physical size of
the CCD is smaller than a 35 mm frame, the effective focal
length is approximately 2.6 times the normal focal length.
For example, a 50 mm focal length lens provides the same
field of view as a 130 mm focal length when used with the
digital camera.
Before starting the aerial
surveys in the Golden Trout Wilderness, a test flight was
completed to determine the spatial resolution of the
digital camera for remote sensing applications. Both the
digital camera and a 35 mm film camera with Kodak
Ektachrome 100 color slide film were flown at an altitude
of 1,000 feet above the ground to acquire vertical
photographs of a Tri-Bar aerial photography resolution
target. Both cameras were operated with similar camera
settings and equivalent focal length lenses to provide
approximately the same field-of-view. As expected, film
has better spatial resolution than the digital imagery.
The 35 mm camera provided a film transparency with
three-inch ground resolved distance as interpreted from
the resolution target, while the Kodak DCS 420 provided an
image file with a six-inch ground resolved distance.
Project Goals and Methodology
The Golden Trout Wilderness is a high elevation ecosystem
of alpine meadows and small meandering streams in the
southern portion of the California Sierra Nevada
mountains. These streams are an important part of the
native habitat for the golden trout, the official
California state fish. Concern has been raised in recent
years about the condition of the meadows and possible
degradation of the riparian habitat. Meadow vegetation is
evolving from grasses and sedges to drier species, such as
sagebrush, and stream channels are widening and becoming
so shallow that they will not support mature golden trout.
Numerous abandoned channels are evident in the meadows,
indicating past channel instabilities. There has been much
speculation about the causes of these changes. Possible
causes include long-term climate fluctuations, natural
evolution of meadow hydrologic systems, and overgrazing.
Remote sensing data will provide information to help
define current meadow vegetation types and channel
condition, locate and map abandoned channels, understand
the causes of habitat change, and monitor changes in
habitat condition over time.
Stream channels in four
meadows within the wilderness area, where intensive field
data has been collected, were investigated in this study.
On three consecutive days, aerial surveys were conducted
using a Cessna 206 airplane at altitudes of 1,500 and
3,000 feet above the ground. The Cessna 206 was equipped
with a camera bay which allowed the Kodak DCS 420, a
Hasselblad 70 mm film camera with Kodak Ektachrome 64
color slide film and a Panasonic 3-CCD color video camera
to be used simultaneously.
After each day of flying,
the video and digital camera data were reviewed to assure
that the coverage and image quality were acceptable. The
digital camera images were saved in a TIFF file format
using a 486 PC and Aldus Photostyler software. The image
data was then exported to the MicroImages TNT Map and
Image Processing System. Color and contrast enhancements
were applied as necessary to the image data to highlight
vegetation types. Interpreting vegetation types is an
important part of mapping riparian ecosystems. Figure 1
displays a digital camera image covering a portion of an
alpine meadow and riparian area. Vegetation types, such as
sagebrush, conifers, willows, and grasses can be
identified and interpreted from the digital image.
Individual digital camera
frames were georeferenced using control provided by an
orthophotograph. Although the most recent orthophotograph
was created using 1976 aerial photography, we were able to
locate enough features, such as rock outcrops and trees,
common to both the orthophotograph and digital image to
use as control points. After georeferencing, a sequence of
overlapping digital camera frames were resampled and
mosaicked to create a composite raster image. The
composite raster image can be used to digitize GIS vector
data and show where vegetation types or stream channel
locations have changed. Figure 2 displays a georeferenced
raster image composed from three overlapping digital
frames. The vectors from the existing GIS data base
overlaid onto the composite raster image show the location
of the road in blue and active stream channel in red. The
GIS data was digitized from a 7.5 minute quadrangle USGS
map which was updated in 1987. A significant difference in
the location of the current active stream channel and the
GIS data can be seen. Overlaying periodic GIS information
over georeferenced digital image data can help fisheries
biologists and hydrologists determine trends in hydrologic
changes and identify potential mitigation measures.
Results and Conclusions
The combination of cameras used in this project provided
valuable, complimentary imagery for riparian mapping and
also highlighted some interesting advantages and
disadvantages of each system. The digital camera proved to
have very good sensitivity, dynamic range and linear color
response. The Kodak DSC 420 has 36 bit color depth which
is especially useful for high contrast scenes such as an
overhead view of a forested area with brightly illuminated
tree canopies and ground vegetation in deep shadows.
The digital camera provided
good quality imagery for both the bright and dark areas
while photographic film and video had a tendency to either
over or under expose these same areas.
The ability to process and
view the digital camera data using a PC and image
processing software soon after a flight was very helpful.
After reviewing digital image data, camera settings and
flight line positions could be adjusted to improve image
quality and area coverage. The digital format also makes
it relatively easy to construct linear composite mosaics
necessary for stream channel studies.
A current limitation of the
Kodak DCS 420 digital camera for remote sensing is data
storage. A 130 MB PCMCIA hard drive stores 78 digital
images. When flown at an altitude of 3,000 feet above the
ground with a 35 mm focal length lens, the 78 frames with
20 percent overlap cover approximately 9.5 linear miles.
The Hasselblad 70 mm camera also shares this limitation. A
large film back holds enough film for approximately 70
frames. The Hasselblad with a 80 mm focal length lens can
cover 22 linear miles at an altitude of 3,000 feet above
the ground with 20 percent overlap. It is possible to
change a Kodak DCS 420 PCMCIA hard drive or Hasselblad
film back while mounted in the camera bay during a flight,
but making the switch can be difficult, especially when
flying during turbulent conditions.
Video cameras have several
features useful for conducting aerial surveys. Video tapes
are inexpensive and can provide continuous coverage of the
all the flight lines. When flying at 3,000 feet above the
ground at a speed of 90 miles per hour, a two hour S-VHS
video tape has the potential of recording approximately
180 linear miles.
Another important feature
is the ability to view the video imagery as it is being
recorded during a flight. This allows the operator to make
adjustments to camera and lens settings, and advise the
pilot if a course correction is needed to maintain
position over a flight line. The audio portion of a video
tape allows the operator to record flight information and
position. It is also easy to annotate video imagery with
GPS coordinates to document the position of the aircraft
along the flight lines.
Both video and digital
cameras perform well under a variety of lighting
conditions and can provide useful imagery under conditions
which would normally preclude the use of film cameras. The
video camera did not perform as well as the digital camera
when imaging high contrast scenes which require a wide
dynamic range.
Video provides much less
spatial resolution than small format aerial photography or
the Kodak DCS 420 digital camera. The S-VHS video format
records approximately 410 lines of the interlaced video
signal. A typical video capture system can digitize and
resample a single frame to a 480 x 512 pixel resolution.
In comparison, a single Kodak DCS 420 digital image, which
is non- interlaced, has more than six times the pixel
resolution of a digitized video frame.
There are many potential
remote sensing applications for digital camera systems. A
major advantage of digital cameras is the ability to
quickly acquire a high quality image in a digital format
compatible with commercial image processing and GIS
systems. It is not likely that current digital cameras,
which are best suited for small projects due to limited
storage capability, will replace other remote sensing
systems such as conventional aerial photography or
airborne video. However, they can provide valuable imagery
to complement other remote sensing data for resource
applications such as environmental monitoring and updating
existing GIS data bases.
About the Authors:
Tom Bobbe is a program leader with the USDA
Forest Service Nationwide Forestry Applications Program
located in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Jim McKean is a geomorphologist and geotechnical
engineer with the USDA Forest Service in Pleasant Hill,
Calif.
Note: The mention of commercial firms or products
is for clarity and identification of procedures and
methods only, and no endorsement is implied by the authors
or the USDA Forest Service.
Back
|