Multi-criteria
Accessibility Evaluation Using GIS as Applied to Industrial
Location
By José F.G. Mendes
ABSTRACT
Determining the proper spot in which to site an industrial
business involves a variety of factors. Some of these elements
are closely associated with the accessibility of potential location
alternatives, which therefore stress the overall importance
of evaluating that accessibility. In this article a multi-criteria
accessibility evaluation model is presented. This model stands
on the following points. First, the accessibility index is a
result of the combination of distances to a set of key destinations
relevant to industrial activity. Second, key destinations can
have different, weighted priorities. Third, key destinations
can be reached either through road or off-road traveling, each
factor having a different resistance to movement, otherwise
known as friction. Fourth, cost-distances to a key destination
are a result of the combination between actual distances and
the friction surface. Finally, cost-distances to key destinations
can be normalized through fuzzy-set functions that, after weighting,
represent their contribution to the accessibility index. This
accessibility model was formulated within a GIS context and
specified for a particular area of northwestern Portugal. For
purposes of this analysis the model is applied to a case study,
and an accessibility map of a Portuguese municipality has been
developed.
Introduction
In a context where land-use
is often highly restricted-due primarily to planning and zoning
options that impose difficult regulations and limitations-decision-making
factors for industrial location should be as rigorous as possible.
In other words, both decision rules and criteria must be chosen
in such a way that both the aim and the conditions for that
decision are accurately described.
In industrial location, a criterion
(also called a factor) is some basis for a decision that can
be measured and evaluated according to how much that decision
enhances or detracts from the suitability of a specific location
alternative for the industrial activity. Many authors who have
studied the phenomenon of industrial location present lists
of factors that are related to particular geographical and socio-economic
realities.
Some of the most often-cited
industrial factors include cost of transportation and proximity
of materials, availability and cost of labor, proximity of markets,
presence of industrial clusters, availability and cost of land
and buildings, access to infrastructures, facilities and services,
personal entrepreneurial preferences, physical conditions of
sites, and industrial support policies and subsidies. It is
self-evident that some of these factors are closely associated
with the accessibility of potential location alternatives, which
stresses the importance of evaluating accessibility.
Multi-criteria Accessibility Evaluation
The concept and evaluation of accessibility has been a topic
of discussion for nearly 200 years. Accessibility depends not
only on the location of opportunities, but also on the ability
to overcome spatial separation between individuals and specific
places.
The model proposed in this article
stands on a measure of separation incorporating the effect of
distance. The principal theoretical points and assumptions in
this model regarding envisioning accessibility include as follows:
a) In this evaluation we are concerned with accessibility for
the purpose of industrial location
b) The accessibility index is a result of the combination of
dis tances to a set of key destinations, which can be particular
points (e.g. facilities), lines (e.g. roads), or areas (e.g.
industrial clusters)
c) Key destinations are related to objectives and purpose and
can have different priorities (weights)
d) Key destinations can be reached through road or off-road
traveling, each method having a different resistance to movement
(friction)
e) Cost-distances to a key destination are the result of the
combination of an actual distance with the friction surface
f) Off-road friction is a function of the slope
g) Cost-distances to key destinations can be normalized through
fuzzy-set functions that, after weighting, represent their contribution
to the accessibility index.
Denoting the fuzzy-set membership
function applied to cost-distances by f(cij), and the weight
of key destination j by wj, the accessibility of a location.
Point/s i, for which accessibility
is measured, depend on the way space is modeled. For a network,
node points are considered. For a continuous space (surface),
grid points are considered. In particular, when a raster model
of the space is used, points become pixels of the raster image
and are dependant on the adopted grid resolution.
Equation (1) is essentially a
weighted linear combination, one of the aggregation procedures
available in the context of multi-criteria evaluation. This
combination approach allows a trade-off of criteria qualities,
implying that compensation for poor quality is achieved by having
a number of stronger qualities. Other aggregation approaches,
like the ordered weighted average, allow some control over trade-off
and incorporate the effect of risk attitude in the evaluation
process.
An important component of a multi-criteria
evaluation model concerns the priorities attached to various
criteria, i.e. the values of weights wj in equation (1). The
objective of developing weights is to quantify the relative
importance of criteria to one another in terms of their contribution
to an overall accessibility index. Among the methods that are
used to derive the weights established and used by different
authors, two are most common. These are the n-points scale (originally
the seven-points scale), and a more complex method called pair-wise
comparisons.
Because of different scales upon
which criteria are measured, it is necessary to standardize
them prior to aggregation. The process of standardization is
essentially identical to that of "fuzzification in fuzzy sets."
The objective is to transform any scale to a comparable one
measured according to a standardized range (e.g. 0-1). In our
case, the result expresses a membership grade that ranges from
0.0 to 1.0, indicating a continuous variation from non-membership
(no accessibility) to complete membership (maximum accessibility)
on the basis of the criterion (distance) that is being fuzzified
(Figure 1).
Depending on the nature of the
criterion being fuzzified, different fuzzy functions can be
selected. Among those most used are sigmoidal (S-shaped), J-shaped,
linear, and complex.
When fuzzifying distance variables,
the sigmoidal monotonically decreasing function (Figure 1) is
one of those most commonly used for instances where membership
grade (i.e. standardised value) is given by: Control points
a and b (Figure 1) are critical points that should be set for
each particular situation, considering their inherent meaning.
A GIS-based Multi-criteria Accessibility Model
The formal model presented in the previous section can be implemented
within a GIS environment, making use of algebraic map functions.
The first step is to create cost-distance maps for each of the
key destinations. The flowchart in Figure 2 shows the sequence
of operations that are required. On one hand, a slope map is
derived from a digital elevation model (DEM). Then a reclassification
operation produces the off-road friction map. On the other hand,
the road friction map is derived directly from a road map. The
overlay of these two friction maps shows its result in the final
friction surface, which is then combined with each of the key
destination maps to give us cost-distance maps.
Having cost-distance maps for
each key destination, the multi-criteria procedure is implemented
following the flowchart of Figure 3. The sequence of operations
starts with the standardization (i.e. the application of the
selected fuzzy-set functions) followed by the weighting. Thereafter
the weighted, standardized cost-distance maps are overlaid to
give us the final accessibility map.
A Model for Northwestern Portugal
In order to use the accessibility evaluation model established
here, the model must be customized to the particular context
under study. This means: (i) to identify the set of key destinations;
(ii) to establish the weights for each key destination; (iii)
to identify the fuzzy-set functions to be used; and (iv) to
set the control points a and b for the fuzzy-set functions.
In the context of an industrial
location study for northwestern Portugal, a panel of 25 industrial
entrepreneurs was interviewed regarding the relevant criteria
involved in their decision-making processes. These criteria
were divided into three main classes: factors associated with
industrial activity, factors associated with administrative
and socio-economic options, and factors associated with physical
planning. Among the elements of the first criteria class, accessibility
was considered the most important.
Results of the interviews as
to accessibility are presented in Table 1, with answers to the
four points stated earlier in this section. Weights were derived
by a pair-wise comparison procedure undertaken with each entrepreneur,
followed by average and normalization. The sigmoidal (monotonically
decreasing) fuzzy function adopted was almost unanimous, and
control-point distances were an averaging of the entrepreneurs'
opinions.
Case Study: Multi-criteria Accessibility Evaluation in Valen¨a,
Portugal
The aforementioned model was applied to create an accessibility
map (for industrial location purposes) of Valen¨a, a municipality
located in northwestern Portugal. The model was implemented
in IDRISI, a raster GIS software program that provides a full
cartographic modeling toolbox, including extensive algebraic
map functions, surface analysis functions, distance functions,
and decision support functions.
The flowchart of the spatial
analysis operations conducted within the GIS environment is
presented in Figure 4 (friction surface) and Figure 5 (accessibility
surface).
All the images were built with
a resolution of 20x20 meters, which resulted in 289,122 pixels
for the 115.6 square kilometers of the study area.
To take advantage of the 256
colors that were provided by the software palette, cost-distance
images were standardized on a continuous scale that ranged from
zero to 255. A score of 255 meant maximum accessibility, and
a score of zero meant no accessibility. The resulting standardized
images ROAD_FUZ, MOTO_FUZ, TRUC_FUZ, RAIL_FUZ, SEAP_FUZ, and
AIRP_FUZ are presented in Figure 6, and the corresponding histograms
of frequencies (of the pixel values) are presented in Figure
7. In order to improve readability, histograms start with accessibility
score 1, thus hiding the frequency of zero scores.
Finally the accessibility map
for Valen¨a is shown in Figure 8, where a generalized image
is presented together with the histogram of frequencies. An
analysis of Figure 6 shows that the six key destinations contribute
differently from the overall accessibility index. An initial
global observation suggests that the northwestern part of the
study area scores higher for accessibility. This is not surprising
since the motorway junctions, and the truck and the railway
terminals, are situated in the western and northwestern sectors.
In addition, there is a hill area that crosses the study area
from east to northwest, characterized by steep slopes and a
lack of roads.
A deeper analysis of the images
of Figure 6, together with the histograms of Figure 7 and the
statistics of Table 3, suggests the following:
a) Standardization affects each image differently due to different
control points of the fuzzy function, thus resulting in different
sizes of the black areas (zero scores)
b) Due to road density and the existence of two motorway junctions,
accessibility is high in most of the study area; it is evident
in the histograms of Figure 7 that there is a concentration
of high scores in the roads and motorway images, which correspond
to mean scores of 149 and 157 respectively
c) In spite of being located not far from each other, the truck
and railway terminals have quite different score surfaces; in
fact, the fuzzy function control point b for the truck terminal
distances is half of that for the railway terminal (10.40km
versus 20.08km), which results in different histograms and mean
values (44 for the truck and 114 for the railway)
d) Seaport and airport terminal images have middle to low scores,
due to the fact that these facilities are located around 35km
away from the study area; this geographical situation is reflected
in the mean values of the score histograms (26 for the seaport
and 60 for the airport).
Regarding the final accessibility
map of Figure 8, the pattern described above does not change
significantly. Combinations of scores result in a surface with
scores that range from zero to 242, with a mean value of 122,
and 15.2 percent of the area has a score of zero. The reclassified
image (Figure 8b) shows a score distribution of irregular rings
centered in the northwestern part of the study area, with two
deformation sources due to the presence of both the southern
motorway junction and the hill area.
Conclusions
Industrial location requires the selection, evaluation and combination
of several factors. Some of these factors are closely associated
with the accessibility of possible location alternatives.
In this article, a multi-criteria
accessibility evaluation model was developed within a GIS context
and specified for a particular area of northwestern Portugal.
The proposed model calculates
an accessibility index given by the weighted summation of cost-distances
to a number of key destinations.
As to the case study, two conclusions
can be drawn. First, from the point of view of the group of
Portuguese industrial entrepreneurs, the most important accessibility
factor is proximity to main roads, followed by proximity to
motorway junctions and to truck freight terminals. Railway,
seaport and airport freight terminals are less important in
terms of industrial location decisions, illustrating how much
the Portuguese economy relies upon road transportation. Second,
applying this model to the municipality of Valen¨a shows its
overall feasibility, and these results have proved to be a useful
piece of information to support decision-making, comprising
maps, histograms and respective statistics.
About the Author:
Josˇ F. G. Mendes is a member of the Department of
Civil Engineering at the University of Minho in Braga, Portugal.
He may be reached via e-mail at [email protected].
Back
|