Current Issues
Archives
Media Kit
Editorial Guidelines
About Us
Contact Us
Subscribe

 

 


HOME > ARCHIVES > 2004 > OCTOBER

Medium Earth Orbit Architecture for an Integrated Environmental Satellite System

Andrew J. Gerber, Richard L. Baron, David M. Tralli, Michael Crison, Shyam Bajpai, and Gerald Dittberner

Introduction

   Operational Earth observing satellites generally reside in low Earth orbits (LEO) at less than 1,000 km altitude and in geostationary Earth orbits (GEO) at ~35,800 km altitude. LEO enables high spatial resolution from greater proximity to the Earth surface, however with low temporal resolution due to the revisit time between observations of a given point on the surface. Comparatively speaking, GEO provides lower spatial resolution, but higher temporal resolution by remaining fixed in the equatorial plane over a given point. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) uses both observation venues for their environmental satellites. Medium Earth orbit (MEO), at altitudes between 1,000 and 35,800 km, may be able to capture the preferred attributes of both LEO and MEO, thus providing the capability for higher spatial and temporal resolution environmental observations. The results of an ongoing MEO system architecture study provide insight into cost-effective operational benefits.

The Current Configuration

   The NOAA operational environmental satellite system is comprised of geostationary satellites for short-range warning, and polar-orbiting satellites for longer-term forecasting. The Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) system maintains a continuous data stream from two satellites, one located at 75 W longitude and the other at 135 W longitude, in support of National Weather Service (NWS) and other users requirements, transmitting environmental data, and visible and infrared images covering the regions of the world from approximately 20 W longitude to 165 E longitude. Imagers on each satellite have the additional capability to focus on narrow regions of the globe, such as to obtain coverage of a hurricane. The Polar Operational Environmental Satellite (POES) system provides daily global coverage, with morning and afternoon low earth orbits that deliver data, including cloud cover, storm location, temperature, and atmospheric heat balance for improved weather forecasting. Additionally, the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP), run by the Air Force Space and Mission Systems Center, is used for monitoring meteorological, oceanographic, and solar-terrestrial physics environments. The future National Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS) and its managing Integrated Program Office (IPO) were established in 1994 to converge existing multi-agency polar-orbiting satellites (POES and DMSP) into an integrated national program that will be used to monitor global environmental conditions, collect and disseminate data related to weather, atmosphere, oceans, land, and the near-space environment. First NPOESS launch readiness is scheduled for 2009, with launches for a fully operational system planned through about 2016.

An Alternate View

   As part of an ongoing system architecture study, the NOAA National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service (NESDIS) Office of Systems Development (OSD) and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) are providing input to the NOAA development process for an environmental observing system that potentially would follow the GOES-R series, scheduled for launch readiness in 2012. A long-term goal of the relationship between NESDIS and JPL is investigating the merits of combining the capabilities of LEO and GEO satellite systems into a consolidated MEO constellation and system.

   The study suggests that a MEO satellite constellation may afford the greatest potential for providing NOAA with the most cost-effective path to the high spatial, temporal, and spectral resolution environmental data it needs to achieve its 21st century strategic plan. The plan recognizes the increasing linkages between the environment, the economy, and public safety with an implementation goal of transitioning from individual polar and geostationary observational programs, to an integrated system that meets current and future observational, processing and communications requirements. The continued optimization of the MEO architecture includes consideration of the data collected by other Earth observing systems and platforms, both nationally and internationally, and recognizes the increased widespread interest in implementing an integrated global earth observation strategy.

   Furthermore, the architecture study is driving the need to understand more comprehensively, the attendant science requirements from the broader ocean and atmosphere communities, towards providing a complete real-time global weather monitoring system and long-term climate and environmental observations. These requirements are being used to define instrument suite options for a potential MEO demonstration mission in the 2012-2013 timeframe. The study process also identifies new sensor needs that would drive technology planning, investment and development.

Demonstration Mission

   The rationale for a MEO demonstration mission is to validate that basic imaging, temperature sounding, and wind and liquid/solid water profile measurement requirements can be met from 10,400 km MEO altitude, and provide a communications backbone for a variety of NASA, NOAA, and NPOESS IPO missions. The overarching purpose of such a mission would be to demonstrate a sustainable, extremely capable system that is superior to current implementations and affords significantly reduced long-term costs compared to other implementations that could deliver similar data products and capabilities. Recognizing that observational requirements dictate temporal resolution, spectral coverage, and resolution, spatial resolution and radiometric performance, an objective of the study is to provide definitive studies and trades as input to roadmaps for MEO and other satellite constellation options for NESDIS/OSD.

   Equatorial-polar (EP), Walker and ICO (i.e., Intermediate Circular Orbit, as for communications satellites) constellation configuration tradeoff studies were performed and evaluated with respect to imaging and sounding coverage, constellation coverage and inter-satellite and downlink communications complexity. The study recommends an EP configuration (Figure 1). Global imaging robustness in terms of each constellation’s 24-hr average coverage percent under a single satellite failure condition was examined (Figures 2 and 3). The concept for an integrated environmental satellite system entails developing a constellation of four equatorial and four polar MEO satellites for the year 2020 timeframe that can make global observations of the weather, atmosphere, oceans, land, and the near-space environment, and acquire real-time images of any place on Earth at any time of day or night.

   An evolutionary MEO road map to a post-GOES-R observational capability must support continually improving weather predictions, plus climate and environmental assessments and forecasts, with near real-time data availability, total global coverage, 0.5 km at 0.5 µm instantaneous geometric field of view or better spatial resolution, improved spectral coverage (including microwave for cloudy weather conditions), and globally consistent, long-term accurate and stable data collection. Based on architecture studies performed to-date, a MEO system could be developed to serve three functions: (1) to demonstrate MEO-observing capabilities with GOES-like instrumentation (Figures 4 and 5); (2) to provide an operational communications system; and (3) to provide a risk retirement test bed for evaluating new instruments developed to exploit MEO opportunities and provide NOAA a cost-effective, risk-reduction path for developing environmental observation instruments for future orbital and ground systems architectures.

   The MEO demonstration plan calls for launching 4 satellites in the equatorial plane of the constellation augmenting the capabilities of GOES-R, other meteorological satellites and NPOESS, while continuing the usage of NPOESS for the polar regions. Furthermore, it provides a platform for validating and demonstrating new instruments to substantially improve the environmental data collection and weather prediction capabilities of NPOESS and GOES-R, such as an advanced optical and infrared imaging and sounding and a high-performance microwave radiometer/sounder with spatial resolution of the order of 1 km and 50 km, respectively. The first pair launch would be about 2013, after the first launches of GOES-R. The focus would be on an operational duration of five to eight years. Emphasis would be on reducing operating costs (compared to existing observational systems), and achieving satisfactory long-term reliability. The MEO mission also would demonstrate satellite-to-satellite and satellite-to-Earth communication capabilities.

Imager and Sounder

   Numerical weather prediction and forecasting models are moving towards improved spatial resolution. An imager provides high spatial resolution for improved feature definition, and a sounder provides high spectral resolution for good radiometry, temperature and water vapor profiling, and trace gas amounts. Imaging and sounding both are needed together. One instrument option for MEO is based on combining the capabilities of two NASA Earth Observation System instruments—the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) with those of the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS). The MODIS instrument provides high radiometric sensitivity in 36 spectral bands ranging in wavelength from 0.37 µm to 14.4 µm. The AIRS instrument, with spectral coverage from 3.7 to 15.4 µm, is the first high-spectral-resolution infrared sounder developed by NASA in support of operational weather forecasting by NOAA. Design studies are in progress for potential development of such an integrated instrument with capabilities that exceed those on GOES-R.

Microwave Radiometer

   As an extension of a GEO synthetic thinned aperture radiometer (GeoSTAR) microwave sounder study by JPL, an initial assessment for aperture synthesis in MEO was performed. The objective is to add microwave sounding capabilities to future systems such as GOES-R, both to complement infrared sounding systems (such as the Hyperspectral Environmental Suite—HES) and to provide all-weather standalone microwave soundings. Aperture synthesis is an approach that does not suffer from the limitations of typically real aperture systems, namely diffraction effects in the effective aperture formed by the reflector, thereby limiting spatial resolution; rather, it uses an array of receivers to form an equivalent aperture with on-board signal processing to measure the phase properties of the radiometric field.

   For a stand alone capability, GeoSTAR can be deployed on a separate platform, but to complement an IR sounder it is important to have the same field of regard, preferably on the same platform. At MEO, although it would be possible to implement a two-dimensional (i.e., star array) system such as GeoSTAR, there are aliasing issues due to the large solid angle subtended by the Earth as seen from MEO. Instead, one-dimensional approaches are being considered—where along-track coverage is obtained through orbital motion. Many details remain to be worked out and evaluated before definitive recommendations can be made. Nonetheless, early indications are that such a microwave radiometer system is also a viable option for MEO.

Communications

   Broader bandwidth communications are needed as a result of higher resolution global coverage and temporal availability, with an approach that reduces the resource load on satellites in order to support the primary function of data collection. Three options for MEO communications architectures were evaluated.

   Option 1 consists of a distributed high-speed ground network with commercial rebroadcast, with upgraded SafetyNet sites and ground network, and with medium data rate rebroadcast. Option 1 is namely a modified NPOESS SafetyNet with commercial rebroadcast, using Ka-band downlinks from the individual satellites using mechanically steered parabolic antennas. This option calls for much higher data rates and extensive network upgrades. Commercial satellites would be used for data rebroadcast (e.g., AWIPS-like broadcast). The rebroadcast data rate is limited, albeit about 25 times higher than the current GOES rebroadcast network, but orders of magnitude lower than the instrument data collection rate. Option 2 comprises optical satellite crosslinks to a downlink satellite with a Ka-band data downlink to a single ground node and a client-server data redistribution network (e.g., no network of ground stations). Onboard processing for routing data satellite-to-satellite would be needed, increasing satellite resources. The satellites would exchange their observational data and satellite health and safety data with each other and with ground-based receiving stations in real-time. The data rates for ground redistribution are limited, but each user gets data as requested. Option 3 consists of optical satellite crosslink with hybrid data redistribution, using medium data rate rebroadcast and a client-server ground network.

Requirements

   MEO mission requirements are derived from requirements in the GOES-R Preliminary Requirements Document. The demonstration constellation of four equatorial satellites, for example, would make observations over the entire range from 60 degrees north to 60 degrees south of the equator, and include interleaving hemispheric (full disc), synoptic (regional CONUS) and mesoscale (rapid-scan) imaging. Full disc imagery data would be taken every 15 minutes, and CONUS imagery data taken every 5 minutes—an equivalent GOES-R “full disc” as seen by the MEO constellation being a composite image from sensors on the multiple satellites. For severe weather activity, updated satellite imagery data covering areas at least 1000 km square area would be taken every 30 sec. The four-satellite constellation would be expected to have an operational availability of at least 98%.

Conclusion

    MEO architecture affords NOAA the potential to provide high spatial, temporal and spectral resolution environmental data comparable to or exceeding that of NPOESS and GOES-R. The architecture study is ongoing, as the opportunities for visible/IR imaging and sounding and microwave radiometry, and a global communications backbone are considered. A draft Program Plan has been developed, and a Program Implementation Plan that would help NOAA transition into an integrated environmental system that meets current and future observational, processing and communications requirements is in progress.

Acknowledgements

   This work was performed by JPL as a member of the NOAA advanced architecture team under a contract to NOAA NESDIS. JPL is a Federally Funded Research and Development Center managed by the California Institute of Technology under contract to NASA. We thank Tom Pagano and Bjorn Lambrigtsen for analyses and discussions related to AIRS and GeoSTAR, respectively, and David Oh for the communications architecture component.

About the Authors

   Andrew J. Gerber, Richard L. Baron and David M. Tralli; National Space Technology Applications (NSTA) Office, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. Focusing on R&D and applications needs of national security and economic significance, NSTA offers organizations opportunities to apply the unique scientific, technological and engineering capabilities resident at JPL to help meet their strategic visions.

   Michael Crison, Shyam Bajpai and Gerald Dittberner; Requirements, Planning and Systems Integration Program/ Office of Systems Development (OSD)/ NESDIS/NOAA. OSD manages the NOAA operational geostationary and polar-orbiting environmental satellites programs and is responsible for defining user requirements and developing designs of future satellite systems to meet those requirements.

For further information, contact [email protected].

Back

©Copyright 2005-2021 by GITC America, Inc. Articles cannot be reproduced,
in whole or in part, without prior authorization from GITC America, Inc.

PRIVACY POLICY